Flexible Path...explained.

The potential benefit of the Flexible Path is quicker access to deep space -- with no funded landing program. Why is this better than a program to land on the moon? Well, it's not necessarily better, but it is a way to take the limitation of minimum funding for exploration and transorm it into a maximum -- maximum travel free of gravity wells. Please watch the following video and learn more about the Flexible Path.

Here is the future...if we can start moving now!

The proposed DIRECT series of boosters (also known as "Jupiter") could very well bring back the launch capability of the Saturn V, or at least close to it. Three problems exist: 1) The Space Shuttle suppliers that have already been shut down may not be ready and available when it is time to build this rocket, 2) Capability at facilities (and associated tooling) that have been shut down, mothballed or redistricted to other uses (for example the Michoud plant that built the STS External Tank) may not be easily reconstituted without cost and delay, and 3) The experienced people who have been turned away will likely not return, and a new cadre of experts must be developed.

Had the Space Program embarked on the path to Ares I and Ares V in parallel, we might not be at the crossroads we find ourselves at today. Unfortunately, the path was serial, with Ares I taking the funding and emphasis while other shuttle assets such as the ET and SSME's were allowed to go extinct.

Can we still salvage the useful parts of the Space Shuttle program? Stay tuned....